About misleading advertisements

A couple of days ago, the government is reported to have floated plans for a 500 million dollar advertising campaign to persuade the people of the USA to take the “swine flu” vaccine.

Any advertising agency participating in such a campaign should be aware they risk exposing themselves to legal action if they intentionally misrepresent the characteristics, nature, origin and benefits of the vaccine.

Specifically, advertising agencies will be called to account if they deceive the public about the nature of the vaccine by using the word “swine flu” in any advertisement when the WHO and US officials themselves have, in the meantime, dropped the use of the “swine flu” and renamed the virus H1N1 in recognition of the fact that the virus has never been found in any pig or animal or human and is, therefore, artificial in origin.

Advertising agencies that put out statements that can be proven by evidence to be false; that create a false impression that the vaccine is the only measure to deal with a natural disease when there is evidence the disease was engineered in a laboratory; that incldue or imply a promise of protection from a disease when there is evidence the shot will itself cause the disease, for example, the fact at least 21 people in 2008 died after receiving a shot from fully licensed pandemic flu vaccine made by Novartis; that imply that the vaccine companies have a record of safety when this can be proved by evidence to be false as is shown by the way Baxter in Austria contaminated 72 kilos of vaccine material with live bird flu in February this year; that conceal the fact the shot is classified as a bioweapon in the US government’s own documents, and so persuade people deliberately, systematically and wilfully to take a shot that is highly likely dangerous to them, risk exposing themselves to charges of conspiracy to commit mass muder – not just of misleading advertisement.

Factually most accurate would be advertisements saying:

“Take your H1N1 virus bioweapon shot this fall. Risk death and injury for no discernible benefit!”

Please find the legal documents to stop this forced mass injection with “bioweapons” (by the government’s own classification) on the Vaccine Liberation website as well.

http://vaclib.org/docs/Criminal-Charges-Swine-flu-v2.doc

Also, I have received reports of journalists who agreed to cover this subject being fired. I advise any journalists who are fired after agreeing to report on this topic to take legal action immediately.

As a citizen and journalist, you have a right and duty to expose crimes that potentially affect millions of people. To be involved in a cover up and in an attempt to conceal key information that indicates a crime is being committed is itself a crime. No one can be legally fired for refusing to be involved in a cover up of a crime. Take legal action against your employer!

Finally, it has come to my attention that blogs have appeared slandering me, Jane Burgermeister, and other members of the team rather than refuting the evidence I and the other experts present. Anyone writing those blogs set up, it seems, just to discredit our legal action is not only guilty of defamation, but most likely also in the direct pay of the people who are listed in the defendants of our legal action — why else so much effort? –, and so put at risk of legal action themselves, naming them as co conspirators in a potential crime of mass murder.

The intensity of the efforts to fire journalists who report on the topic, hack the websites with the documents and spread slander are a happy indication, however, that our legal action is an effective approach, and in that respect, are very much to be welcomed.