Austrian Minister confirms Baxter investigation


Confirmation in the form of a letter from the Austrian Health Minister that charges were filed by against Baxter over the bird flu incident and that Austrian law enforcement are investigated can be seen under this link http://wakenews.net/Hinausschrift_BMG-92400_0049-I_B_8_2009_20.05.2009_Burgermeister__Jane.pdf
Download site:

http://wakenews.net/html/jane_burgermeister.html

6 Responses to Austrian Minister confirms Baxter investigation

  1. Appalled says:

    1. Government Accountability has caught them WHO, CDC and UN redhanded before
    http://www.whistleblower.org/content/press_detail.cfm?press_id=1340

    2. Dr. David Ayoub – presentation lays out which groups are involved

    3. Rima E. Laibow, MD
    Medical Director
    Natural Solutions Foundation
    http://www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
    http://www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

    The World Health Organization also has a Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. An article in Human Reproduction (Human Reproduction, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 166-172, 1991© 1991 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology) called “The WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation. Its formation, objectives and research activities” by P.D. Griffin of the Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland summarized its work this way:

    “Over the past 18 years, the WHO Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation has been supporting basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology. As a result of this inter national, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.”

    That means that since 1973 the World Health Organization has been looking for ways to use vaccines and injections to control the world’s fertility. If those methods are offered to men and women so that they can make a choice about their reproductive lives, well and good. If, however, they are hidden in smallpox vaccines (Africa) with the avowed purpose of “eliminating 150 million excess Sub Saharan Africans” as they were in vaccines distributed by the WHO starting in 1985, or in tetanus vaccineswhich would cause abortions in South and Central America women starting in the 1990’s, we are not dealing with reproductive options, but reproductive genocide.

    The FDA approved the same sterility vaccine in the US within the last 18 months. For what purpose? Which group will receive it in which vaccine, hidden in a syringe supposedly offered to “protect” patients?

    Is the World Health Organization empowered to decide which group of people may reproduce and which must become sterile? And if so, by whom is it so empowered? How about the FDA?

    As bad as this news is, there is worse news yet to come. Corn, sacred in Mexico and Central America as the very staff of life, has been turned into the very end of life. Genetic modification of corn has turned the Mexo American giver of life into the stuff that can end a race – perhaps the human race – by engendering sterility in males who eat it.

    Genetically modified corn is used to create high fructose corn syrup, flavors, starches, flours, proteins, sugars and most of the other ingredients which make up our processed foods. The US refuses to allow the labeling of foods which contain genetically modified ingredients (like corn) to be labeled to indicate that fact so we are looking at the possibility of undeclared birth control “foods” rendering whole populations sterile. The US Government, starting with George Herbert Walker Bush, has adopted the policy that genetically modified foods are the same as unmodified ones. The sterility corn is therefore, under this policy, the same as natural corn.

    If the US has its way, all such products will be acceptable for international trade without any labeling. It behooves the other countries of the world to face down the demands of the US and its allies at the Codex table to make sure that no such permission is granted, that a ban on GM food is put in place for the international trade of seed and processed food, flours and other consumables, that animals are not fed GM feeds and that all genetically modified foods imported from countries such as the US bear not only the information that they contain GM food, but the specific strain which they contain listed on their label for both bulk processors and the final consumer

    A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile. At the time Epicyte had a joint venture agreement to spread its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was since acquired by a North Carolina biotech company. Astonishing to learn was that Epicyte had developed its spermicidal GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same USDA which, despite worldwide opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, now held by Monsanto.

    In the 1990’s the UN’s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45, allegedly against Tentanus, a sickness arising from such things as stepping on a rusty nail. The vaccine was not given to men or boys, despite the fact they are presumably equally liable to step on rusty nails as women.

    Because of that curious anomaly, Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the Tetanus vaccine being spread by the WHO only to women of child-bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone which when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.

    It later came out that the Rockefeller Foundation along with the Rockefeller’ s Population Council, the World Bank (home to CGIAR), and the United States’ National Institutes of Health had been involved in a 20-year-long project begun in 1972 to develop the concealed abortion vaccine with a tetanus carrier for WHO. In addition, the Government of Norway, the host to the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault, donated $41 million to develop the special abortive Tetanus vaccine.

    Is it a coincidence that these same organizations, from Norway to the Rockefeller Foundation to the World Bank are also involved in the Svalbard seed bank project? According to Prof. Francis Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 enacted by the US Congress, the Pentagon is `now gearing up to fight and win biological warfare’ as part of two Bush national strategy directives adopted, he notes, `without public knowledge and review’ in 2002. Boyle adds that in 2001-2004 alone the US Federal Government spent $14.5 billion for civilian bio-warfare- related work, a staggering sum.

    Rutgers University biologist Richard Ebright estimates that over 300 scientific institutions and some 12,000 individuals in the USA today have access to pathogens suitable for biowarfare. Alone there are 497 US Government NIH grants for research into infectious diseases with biowarfare potential. Of course this is being justified under the rubric of defending against possible terror attack as so much is today.
    Many of the US Government dollars spent on biowarfare research involve genetic engineering. MIT biology professor Jonathan King says that the `growing bio-terror programs represent a significant emerging danger to our own population.’ King adds, `while such programs are always called defensive, with biological weapons, defensive and offensive programs overlap almost completely.’

    Time will tell whether, God Forbid, the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Bank of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation is part of another Final Solution, this involving the extinction of the Late, Great Planet Earth.

    F. William Engdahl is the author of Seeds of Destruction, the Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation just released by Global Research. He also the author of A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, Pluto Press Ltd.

    This entry was posted on Thursday, March 6th, 2008 at 2:21 am and is filed under GMOs, Medical Hazards, Privacy . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

  2. kelly says:

    NEVER supported GMOs!! Thanks for this very informative information. Bookmarked so I can return! Am tweeting to my network!!

  3. It is not just about vaccines – the drug wars are also part of the problem since it is in Big Pharma’s interest to block the marketing of unpaintable natural healing substances.

    Suppressed report raises questions about drug policy
    VANCOUVER SUN JUNE 18, 2009 EDITORIAL
    In 1991, an editorial in the British Journal of Addiction condemned the inordinate amount of resources devoted to drug law enforcement, and compared the war on drugs to the witch hunts of the past.
    It’s an apt comparison, since drug warriors around the world are influenced more by myths, stereotypes and propaganda than by solid evidence. And when confronted by evidence that conflicts with the myths, stereotypes and propaganda of the drug war, the warriors seek to bury it rather than address it head on.
    The 1995 Cocaine Project, a joint effort of the World Health Organization and the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute, is a case in point.
    You might never have heard of the Cocaine Project, and you might wonder why we’re discussing a report that’s 14 years old. The answer is simple: The WHO has never published the report, and even denied its existence, at least until last week when it was leaked to a Netherlands-based think-tank, The Transnational Institute.
    This is unfortunate, given that the report sought the advice of experts from around the world, assessed cocaine use from Australia to Zimbabwe, and is the largest global study on cocaine ever conducted.
    But a brief look at some of the study’s conclusions and recommendations reveals why it has been buried for the past 14 years.
    For example, the report condemns the “over-reliance on law enforcement measures,” and recommends that “education, treatment and rehabilitation” programs be increased to re-balance our approach to problematic drug use.
    Perhaps because the report was buried, this over-reliance on enforcement continues today, and many experts are saying the same thing the WHO said 14 years ago. But such recommendations don’t sit well with many drug warriors, who remain convinced of the seminal importance of law enforcement in decreasing drug use.
    Reasonable people can disagree on how best to deal with drug abuse. But the facts are a different thing entirely, and what bothered the drug warriors the most wasn’t the report’s recommendations, but its statements of fact — that is, its findings about the effects of cocaine use.
    The report notes, for instance, that health problems from “the use of legal substances, particularly alcohol and tobacco, are greater than health problems from cocaine use.”
    If that weren’t enough, it states that “few experts describe cocaine as invariably harmful to health,” and that problems “are mainly limited to high-dosage users.” Indeed, “occasional cocaine use does not typically lead to severe or even minor physical or social problems . . . a minority of people start using cocaine or related products, use casually for a short or long period, and suffer little or no negative consequences, even after years of use.”
    To top it off, the report states that the “use of coca leaves . . . has positive therapeutic, sacred and social functions for indigenous Andean populations” — a reference to South American aboriginals who have used coca leaves for thousands of years.
    Now, however politically incorrect these conclusions are, they are either factually correct or incorrect. If they’re incorrect, they ought to be countered vigorously; if correct, they ought to inform our drug policy.
    Instead, the WHO buried the report, largely as a result of pressure from the United States
    It’s interesting to note that in 2008, the WHO reported that the U.S. has the highest rate of cocaine use in the world. Interesting, but not surprising, for no drug control approach can be “proven” if it is the result of intentionally ignoring the evidence.
    In fact, the U.S. provides a perfect example of the folly of attending to the evidence one likes, and ignoring the rest.
    Now that the WHO report has been published by the Transnational Institute, it’s time for all countries, including Canada, to take a long, hard look at their drug policy, and at the evidence, and to ensure that the former is informed by the latter.
    © Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

    What changed their minds about opium???

    In 1915, the lead sentence in a lead article in the Journal of the American Medical Association characterized opium thus: “If the entire materia medica at out disposal were limited to the choice and use of only one drug, I am sure that a great many, if not the majority, of us would choose opium: and I am convinced that if I were to select, say half a dozen of the most important drugs in the (Pharmacopoeia), we should all place opium in the first rank.” (Ceremonial Chemistry, Thomas Szaz, PhD)

    The pharmaceutical industry profits from the demonizing of opium – a natural medicine derived from the poppy.

    Big Pharma sells thousands of patented – and therefore profit protected – over the counter or by prescription – synthetic or partly synthetic drugs many of which are opium based.

    Synthetic Tylenol (acetomenophen) is the pain killer most doctors recommend. It is the number one cause of liver failure in North America. In many instances the victim ends up requiring a liver transplant. The drug regulators have recommended that the potency of Tylenol be reduced.

    The drugs wars are wars against peoples’ right to health and healing naturally – hence the on going attempts to marginalize access to vitamins, minerals and herbs.

    CW

  4. MK says:

    Leuren Moret wrote an article on the spermicidal corn profiling a Mexican professor who broke the news that this corn was being sent secretly to Mexico to disrupt fertility there. The Native American peoples and the Africans discovered that there were shots with anti-HCG antibodies in them being given to the women in those countries. Charges were filed, but nothing happened. In both cases, the shots were distributed by Rockefeller-related groups. Many African countries will no longer accept such “gifts” from American charities.

    Finally, there are excellent books on the many hazards of GMOs including the ability to affect DNA in the organisms that consume them and to create new forms of weird mutant bacteria as the segments of inserted DNA flow through the digestive tract. Genetic engineering as practiced by the mainstream scientists is very flawed.

    http://sunshine-project.org/ This was a watchdog group that did very good work in this area until they lost their funding. Read through their pages if you want to know just how scary things are.

  5. jimmy says:

    Godspeed to you for taking this monumental task and putting it in motion. I thank you on behalf of the sleeping people of the world!

  6. Ok,thank you,I’m going to try this too.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 165 other followers

%d bloggers like this: