Has Tim Vawker filed an injunction or not?

The circus concerning Tim Vawker’s injunction continues:

http://rense.com/general87/mislead.htm

Did the vaccine companies realise that if they put in a poor injunction and that injunction fails, an almost insurmountable precedent would be set?

Why did Tim Vawker put in such a weak injunction? Or did he really not put in any injunction at all as he claimed and as Devvy Kidd alleges here on Rense?

“In US district court [and most of the courts in this country], the first paper to be filed usually has the stamp of the court clerk and the case number handwritten by the clerk on the first page. I have seen a court stamp on an exhibit. Not the same,” emails a reader of the blog.

Did Vawker tell Barbara Minton of Natural News the injunction had been granted when it had just been handed in? Who gave her that information? Has she been set up? Or did she not do her research properly?

Elizabeth Book hired Tim Vawker. Why did she pick Vawker out and pay him so much money?

One thing is for sure: I am out of this circus surrounding Devvy Kidd, True Ott, Deagle, Vawter and this strange injunction story.

I just hope Elizabeth Book of Florida who “hired” Vawter does not regret her choice too much.

As I made it clear in an email posted on fourwinds10.com last week, I was not impressed by Vawter’s injunction I did not get to see before Vawter filed it,though he gave assurances he would file a second stronger motion to back the first up. But not even I suspected the injunction would turn out to be such a media “spectacle”. Who is behind this?

Did Big Pharma know I planned to file an injunction and get there first?