September 9/11: architects and engineers give scientific evidence of a controlled demolition

Architects and engineers in the USA have given compelling scientific evidence that the steel-framed Twin Towers could only have collapsed through a controlled demolition.

It is not clear how the third tower could have collapsed or why the BBC reported its collapse 23 minutes early. The news reader Jane Standley said she received a report from Reuters and simply read it out.

The facts and evidence strongly suggest that the official story of the events surrounding September 9/11 are a fiction created and sustained by the corporate controlled mainstream media serving political and financial interests.

George Orwell delivered a powerful critique of the BBC and modern mass media as a tool of propaganda in his book “1984”, and surely there was never a more spectacular lie created by the corporate mass media than the September 9/11 myth, though the swine flu pandemic hype probably had an even bigger global reach.

Nine years later, Germany’s Bild and the rest of the mainstream media continue to repeat the 9/11 lie that a terrorist attack was responsible for the collapse of the Twin Towers as if all this evidence does not exist for war mongering purposes.

Check out the website of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to read the scientific evidence for believing the Twin Towers were destroyed by a controlled demolition.

And take a look at this blogspot for a fictional look at the events of 9/11 as seen through the eyes of “President George Strong.”

“The Twin Towers’ destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives:

1. Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration

2. Improbable symmetry of debris distribution

3. Extremely rapid onset of destruction

4. Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes

5. Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally

6. Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking

7. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds 8. 1200-foot-dia. debris field: no “pancaked” floors found

9. Isolated explosive ejections 20 – 40 stories below demolition front

10. Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame

11. Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises

12. Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples

13. Evidence of explosives found in dust samples

14. No precedent for steel-framed high-rise collapse due to fire

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.

1. Slow onset with large visible deformations

2. Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)

3. Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel

4. High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”

18 Responses to September 9/11: architects and engineers give scientific evidence of a controlled demolition

  1. Carlitos Amsel vom Holunderstrauch says:

    Yes, it was to be expected, that this year massiv true information concerning 9.11. would be brought to light. And just look at the established media scramble to hide it all behind a smokescreen of one hired lunatic who might burn a Koran and another handy instrument that juggles with the question wether it is nice to build a mosque near ground zero…-

  2. ko says:

    About the 911 demolition.

    911 WTC Nuclear Demolition
    and read Dimitri Khalezovs
    911thology, the third truth about 911

    The first truth is the official one and the second truth are the theories, the controlled opposition. Spinning and pretending. But always controlled.

    AE is asking for an investigation. By whom? You can investigate things by yourself and see what is right and wrong.

  3. Carlitos Amsel vom Holunderstrauch says:

    Yea, lets have a third “Truth”, and maybe a fourth and lets break our heads which one is right one! Individual truth will bring us nowhere. If we ever want a chance to stop this massmurdering machine, We need a comon truth that will lead to the imprisonment of powerfull people…

  4. […] September 9/11: architects and engineers give scientific evidence of a controlled demolition Jane Burgermeister | September 11, 2010 at 11:26 am | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: […]

  5. ko says:

    I guess you haven’t read the book or seen the interview, otherwise you shouldn’t say something like that.

    Truth is allways a matter of individuality. There is no such a thing as a common truth. Who will give it to you? Who will investigate the Powers That Be? You can do it yourself and make your conclusions. Nobody else can.

  6. Carlitos Amsel vom Holunderstrauch says:

    Well, I guess we can all agree upon, that it is a comon truth that tomorrow morning the sun will rise, cant we? But acording to you there is no such thing as a comon truth? Give me a break!

  7. Carlitos Amsel vom Holunderstrauch says:

    It is now 6 o’clock in the morning in Germany. I have listened to BBC word Service all night. BBC World Service is a worldwide news outlet that broadcasts news every 30 minutes. All night long, there was not a word, not a silable, about the presents or even existence of any alternative 9.11 movement. What was mentioned, and that every 30 minutes, was the presents of two groups of protesters, one for the mosque near ground zero, the other one against it. There was mentioned that the names of the victims of 9.11. where read and that Obama held a speech at the pentagon in which he said, “We have nothing against islam”. Thats all. Not a word, not a silable about the presents or existence of any alternativ 9.11. movement. According to last nights BBC world service news broadcast, there was no alternative 9.11. movement in New York worth mentioning. I hope we had more luck elsewhere…-

  8. Otto Lund says:

    Now it’s nine years since global criminal syndicates executed massacres under false flag, on September 11 2001. It’s not the first and last time they did an evil, primitive, egoistic and unlawful deed against all life and environment

    Intelligence Report from Field McConnell and David Hawkins as of year 2010 3Q, monthly, radioshow 8 September 2010, part 4 to 6 in audiopanel September 1 – 29, 2010

    * With your help we will together be more able to solve the crime and secure all citizens’ well-beeing and security. I strongly recommend to look into the referred intelligence reports

    Thank you

  9. pehman says:

    Open letter of solidarity with the brave and beautiful Austrian journalist Jane Burgermeister, one of the spokesmen of the hidden information on influenza A, and that because of their just demands you want to disable an embarrassing trial in a mock trial in Austria:

    Greetings from Spain, congratulations for your hard work and encouragement and acknowledge the great courage you show to the calumnies and slanders made against you, so embarrassing and so unfair. Jane, thank you very much for your good work. You have our support to the truth, which will prevail. I wish I may overcome all trials where you falsely reported in Austria and massively and we must condemn the criminal now multinational pharmaceutical Baxter, the other fatal and WHO

  10. Carlitos Amsel vom Holunderstrauch says:

    According to this information, we have to do with deeply dug in, highly intelligent criminals, not only far rooted in history, but but also experts in modern technologys, especially comunication technology. Obviously, these are highly dangerous people, as various deaths, for example that of Gareth Williams show, one wonders, how come Field Mc Connel and David Hawkins are still alive? In this information it is said, “The Crown” refers to Her Majesty The Queen of England, while other sources quite convincingly claim, “The Crown” refers to the City of London…(?)

    All in all quite interesting and disturbing information…:

  11. nana says:

    Dear Jane,

    I’m so pleased that the pressure is now off you (court case, etc).

    This site will provide much useful information:

    Kind regards

  12. Carlitos Amsel vom Holunderstrauch says:

    Well…- no doubt it takes a Jew to accuse a Jew. If I did it, I might end up in prison. Still,scanning this site, I do get a slight feeling of unbalance. But maybe here, as elsewhere, it’s difficult to find a middle…?

  13. TheBan says:

    Jane, just one suggestion; please try to keep your posts in “simple english” (read; en-US english). Most of your international visitors (and I beleive in this moment they are your best audience) could not understand posted articles as they should.
    Please try to simplified your annoucements because I beleive that “spreading the word” to all nations is at most importance at the moment.
    Keep in mind – most non-english nations still have an “open mind” and are not “slaves” of public propaganda. From that population we could expect some action. For most of 9-17/mortgage/syndicate/shout-up-and-work is too late…
    Tnx and keep up the good work!

  14. TheBan says:

    For all those who doubt; “it’s better to live one moment as lion than eternity as mouse…” and “it’s not grater love than to give your life for your loved once”…
    One more; “evil happens when good people do nothing”!

  15. M Rahman says:

    Thanks. Grateful to know about valuable information.

  16. Carlitos Amsel vom Holunderstrauch says:

    The suggestion to write in simple english is not a good one, for in the end one is forced to write like a child, only to be understood by those, poor in english. I have a much better suggestion. All of you that have trouble reading and understaning Janes written english: LEARN TO READ AND UNDERSTAND IT !!!!!!!

  17. noone says:

    Strangely enough no one here or anywhere else who challenge the official 9/11 story ever mentioned a 150 ktone nuke devices under 2 towers that were included in official planning for possible demolition if such required. Where are those devices now if they were not used on 9/11?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: