DRAFT OF FIRST PART OF CHARGES AGAINT LARISA JUSTICE OFFICIALS

January 31, 2016

The draft first part of the charges against Larisa justice officials in English sent to my Greek translator….

Still have to edit the second part of the charges as well as collect all the relevant evidence and documents, much of which is already on this blog.

More soon…

 

To the first state prosecutor,

Dikastiko Megaro, Kentriki Plateia, Larisa

 

31 January 2016

Jane Buergermeister, Larisa

 

I am writing this report to present evidence that

deputy state prosecutor Anna Balogianni,

state prosecutor Christina (? first name not known) Fasoula,

police official Vangelis Toutounas and other unknown officials,

and my former lawyer Kontantinos Christopoulos,

have conspired to cover up the crimes of

Theodekti Polychronia Vallianatou,

the Abbess of St John the Forerunner monastery, Anatoli, Ajia,

by giving me the false and misleading impression that a full police investigation was taking place while, in fact, thwarting justice by directing the investigation to the wrong monastery, namely St George, Karditsa, and to a not clearly identified person, namely Th. Ballianatou in a police note with dates in July offering guidance on the investigation, with the intention of suppressing and withholding evidence concerning the crimes of Theodekti Vallianatou, and of setting me up for the false accusation that I was making unfounded accusations.

In addition, as I demonstrate in this report, the above mentioned justice officials and lawyer have acted in concert to orchestrate a campaign of harrassment and cover up since I began to put information, proof and evidence on my blog, birdflu666 on Thursday 28th, January 2016. I was false accused of defamation and summoned immediately to the police station in a call from the police at 3 20 pm on Friday 29th January 2016. When I said the evidence was on my blog in English and I was having it translated into Greek, I was threatened with a police car “sent to my home.”

Also, the police also changed incriminating numbers on their webpage shortly after I put evidence up on Saturday 30th January. The incriminating numbers were removed by Sunday 31 January, the next day.

The immediate removal of the incriminating telephone numbers from the homepage of the Larisa police headquarters satisfies beyond reasonable doubt that the purpose of the police is sinister and is known to be such by the highest ranks of the police. The highest ranks are anxious to cover their tracks as fast as possible and set me up for the false charge of making false accusations. As the highest rank, they have the power to order the police webpage to be changed at short notice, even over a weekend, when staffing levels in Greek police stations are generally much lower than usual.

If the police were acting in good faith with the honest purpose of conducting a genuine independent investigation into crimes, there would have been no need to alter the police headquarters homepage to remove incriminating telephone numbers at such speed.

This fact can also be seen on screenshots of google searches with “Larisa and ” visible in the cache pages.

I ask you to immediately remove the above individuals from my case, currently under review by Fasoula, and to give me immediate access to the file XXX to ascertain what pieces of evidence have been collected and to correct short comings respecting my rights to due process enshrined in European law.

 

Charges against Vangelis Toutounas and unknown police officials at Larisa police Headquarters

86, Al. Papanastassiou Street, 41110 Larisa

1. The content of a police note dated from July

The evidence that the police in Larisa deliberately tried to thwart justice comes in the form of a note on a piece of scrap paper which offers instructions to police on how to investigate the crimes with dates at the end of July, 2015, given.

A handwritten note gives instructions to focus on the the wrong monastery, St George, Mavrommati, Karditsa, against which I have not brougt any charges.

The note is headed by the name Gounelas, a firm that gives away from free office stationary.

The note focuses the investigation on my transfers of money to St George, ie to the wrong monastery while ignoring my electronic transfers of money to the right monastery ie to St John the Forerunner, which are the subject of my complaint.

The handwirrten instructions tenaciously omits any mention of Theodekti Polychronia Vallianatou, my tranfers of money to her private bank account and any mention of the monastery of St John, the Forerunner, Anatoli.

The misleading connection between my bank transfers of money sets me me up for the false charge of making false accusation.

In addition, the final instruction in the note requires me to write everything I know about someone referred to “Th. Ballianatou.”

The reference to Th. Ballianatou deliberately obscures the identity of Theodekti Polychronia Vallianatou. It strongly suggests the notion that Th. Ballianatou is a civilian person with a forename beginning with Th such as Theodora and the surname Ballianatou or Vallianatou.

Theodekti Vallianatou is, however, a monastic, known exclusively through her monastic name Theodekti. The monastic name Theodekti is never shortened to “Th” as civilian first names are.

The use of “Th Ballianatou” also obscures the fact that the civilian name of Theodekti, which is Polychronia Vallianatou.

Instead of referring to Theodekti or Polychronia Vallianatou, and so providing an unambiguous identification, the note refers to a conflation of the two names to create deliberate confusion about the identity of the prime suspect.

The name at the bottom of the scrap note is Evangelis Toutounas and the number is the number of the public security office of Larisa police station.

Dates at the end of July are given.

2. Evidence that the note is written by the Larisa police

a. The name at the bottom of the scrap note is Evangelis Toutounas and the number is the number of the public security office of Larisa police station.

b. That this note is from the police is also confirmed in an email dated July 8th 2015 from my former lawyer Konstantinos Christopoulos.

Christopoulos tells me in this email the police have ordered and investigation. He instructs me to write about St George as did the handwritten note, albeit also mentioning Ajia.

He also tells me the police want me to write everything I know about “Th. Ballianatou” at the end of his email, that is, copying the order of instructions of the handwritten note.

“Th. Ballianatou” is is a clear reference to the note where “Th. Ballianatou” is written in Greek letters.

In no other email or communication did Christopoulos refer to Theodekti as Th, Ballianatou. The name on the file he gave me is Theodekti.

This email from Christopoulos mirroring the order of the note and its focus on St George and Th Ballianatou , demonstrates beyond all reasonable doubt that the handwritten note was from the police as Christopoulos claims.

While Christopoulos knew that no investigation had been ordered, he misled me deliberately in the email by saying one had been ordered and he included a reference to the right monastery in Anatoli, Ajia, to make his false claim seem more plausible to me.

There are none of the legal forms one might expect of a police investigation, such as an official communication on police paper or a police file number.

There are also none of the specific instructions one might expect to find in a police investigation, such as the instruction to question the prime suspect, Theodekti Vallianatou, or key witnesses such as Theonike or Theoktisti or collect other objective evidence from the scene of the crime, specifically the monastery of St John the Forerunner.

The vague, misleading and false instructions allow for the construction of a completey different case from the one I filed against Theodekti. It is possible to set up a completely false set of presumptions or arguments that i made charges against the monastery of St George concerning transfers of money and against someone called Th Ballianatou.

There were no other documents, emails or paper from any identifiable police authority in my file handed to me by Christopoulos on the evening of Thursday 27th when he handed me his resignation which might correct the false impression made by this handwritten note.

3. Evidence that the police knew that they had a sinister purpose in writing a handwritten note

The police note from July is hand written on scrap paper and not signed precisely because it is not permissible to order an official investigation into the wrong monastery, and wrong or person.

The handwritten, unsigned note turns the guidance into a carefully guarded secret in as far as it does not need to appear in any official file.

The aim of the handwritten note is to give instructions that appear to plausbibly suggest that a genuine investigation is taking place but uses unsound facts and fallacious reasoning ensuring that a genuine investigation will not place and the pseudo investigation will fail, setting me up for the false charge of making wrong accusations.

The authors of the handwritten, unsigned note knew this and wanted to keep the note out of an official file.

4. Evidence that the police knew that they had a sinister purpose, tampering with the telephone evidence

After I put information showing that the number at the end of the note was the number of the Larisa police headquarters on my blog on Saturday 30th, 2016, the website of Larisa police headquarters was changed overnight and the incriminating numbers were removed in an obvious effort to hide the connection.

This tampering with the evidence satisfies us beyond a reasonable doubt that the purpose of the police guidance was sinister and was known to be such by the person who issued it and by the police or state prosecutors who received the directions.

I note that the director of the police headquarters has personal links with Theodekti Vallianatou, creating a clear conflict of interest.


CHARGES AGAINST LARISA JUSTICE OFFICIALS IN PROGRESS

January 31, 2016

Greece truly is a very dangerous place for journalists as I see.

If I do not post every day in the next few days, it is likely because the police in Larisa will have picked me up, arrested me,  and forced me to sign a confession to the murder of Zeus or Athena something. Or if I appear with black eyes and slurred speech and start claiming I was confused about Theodekti Vallianatou, then you will also know it was the police in Larisa.

Not joking given all that has happened so far and the reputation of the police among the locals.

But I am not the only victim of police brutality in Greece. The farmers protesting crushing new taxes and social security contributions were tear gased in Thessaloniki. The Greek police are the attack dogs of George Soros and Alexis Tsipras, both highly likely readers of this blog, as I prove in my report, which I managed to get in to the Larisa state prosecutor’s office.

Some evidence of the cover up by the police is already on this blog. It will be presented in full to the top state prosecutor in Larisa and sent to all the political parties and independent media.

Here is the beginning of the charges against the Larisa police, state prosecutor and lawyer…

More soon…

“I am writing this report to present evidence that deputy state prosecutor Anna Balogianni, state prosecutor Christina Fasoula, police official Vangelis Toutounas and my lawyer Kontantinos Christopoulos have conspired to cover up the crimes of Theodekti Polychronia Vallianatou, the Abbess of St John the Forerunner monastery, and others

by giving me the false and misleading impression that a full police investigation into the crimes ofTheodekti Polychronia Vallianatou and others was taking place while using the forms of the legal process to thwart justice by directing the investigation to the wrong monastery, namely St George, Karditsa, to a not cleary identifiable person “Th. Ballianatou” in an attempt to suppress and withhold evidence.

Furthermore, I accuse the above of attempt to harass, bully, intimidate me and threaten me with legal action in an attempt to cover up their crimes. Numbers in a key piece of evidence have already been altered by the police in Larisa.

 


ABSOLUTE PROOF IT WAS THE POLICE OF LARISA WHO NAMED WRONG MONASTERY

January 31, 2016

*EMAIL FROM LAWYER KONSTANTINOS CHRISTOPOULOS TO ME IN JULY TELLING ME THE POLICE HAVE ORDERED AN INVESTIGATION REFERS TO SAME TH BALLAIANTOU AS SCRAP NOTE

*CHRISTOPOULOS GIVES ME SAME INSTRUCTION AS SCRAP NOTE  IN REGARD TO TH BALLIAANTOU

*SAME REFERENCE TO TH BALLIANATOU AT ABOUT SAME TIME IS ABSOLUTE PROOF THE SCRAP NOTE COMES FROM THE POLICE

*SCRAP NOTE FOCUSES INVESTIGATION ON AN UNIDENFIABLE PERSON CALLED “TH BALLIANATOU”, OMITS NAME OF PRIME SUSPECT OR THE MONASTERY OF ST JOHN THE FORERUNNER

 

Unambiguous proof that the Larisa police thwarted my case in summer comes in the form of an email from my former lawyer Konstantinos Christopoulos.

TH.png

Christopoulos tells me in an email dated July 8th that the police directorate has ordered an investigation. He tells me the police have asked me to write everything I know about “Th. Ballianatou” at the end of his instructions to me.

In the note with the name Vangelis Toutounas and the police number of Larisa at the bottom, the final instruction is all to write about  some called “Th. Ballianatou” . This is written in Greek letters “Θ Βαλλιανάτου.”

 

toutounas Th
The reference to one Th Ballianatou is exactly the same in the email of Christopoulos telling me the police have ordered an investigation and saying they want me to write everything I know about Th Ballianatou and the note with the police number at the bottom.

So the email of Christopoulos clearly refers to this scrap of paper with no signature which is focussing on the wrong monastery and on a deliberately unidenfiable person with the name “Th. Ballianatou.”

A note written on scrap paper with no signature is not an order for an official police investigation. The person who wrote this note knew they were giving instuctions which would direct the investigation into a blind alley and did not want it to be captured in official file.

Theodekti is the name of the Abbess and that is how people call her or address her and identify her 99.99% of the cases. It is clearly a  monastic name and not a civilian name. In official documents, I believe she appears as Theodekti Vallianatou ie her monastic name and her surname appear.

In fact, I only know her civilian name Polychronia Vallianatou because I transferred money to her private bank account. I spent 18 months in the monastery and I never heard her referred to by anyone ever except as Theodekti.

A monastic is always referred to using their monastic name in the Greek Orthodox Church. That monastic name is never shortened and placed before a surname as in Th Ballianatou.

That name could refer to any one with a forename beginning with Th like Thomas or Theodrous Θεοδώρα, Θεόδωρος, Θωμάς  and the surname Ballianatou. There is no indication that it refers to a monastic. For example there is a film director called Θωμάς Βαλλιανάτος, which he shortens to Θ Βαλλιανάτος.

http://www.greekanimation.com/movies/stalin-cola/

Vallianatou, sometimes written Ballianatou, is quite a common surname. 

In addition, the date of email from Christopoulos, July 8th, is the same time frame as the note.


LARISA POLICE TAMPER TODAY WITH EVIDENCE, REMOVE PHONE NUMBERS FROM WEBSITE

January 31, 2016

Yesterday I presented evidence that the police in Larisa thwarted the investigation into Theodekti Vallianatou by focussing on the wrong monastery.

Crucial to a note I found in my file naming the wrong monastery was the number of the central police station in Larisa written at the bottom together with the name Vangelis Toutounas.

I took a screen shot yesterday of the police station with the two numbers clearly visible in the second line.

police correct.png

Today, already the website of the police department has been altered and the numbers changed to obscure the connection.

The numbers have been removed altogether.

police tamper.png

In short, the police are already trying to cover up their crime, and they have been caught red handed tampering with the evidence and at record speed.

More soon.

 


PROOF OF MY TRANSFERS OF MONEY TO THEODEKTI VALLIANATOU, IGNORED BY LARISA JUSTICE OFFICIALS WHO NAME WRONG MONASTERY FOR INVESTIGATION

January 30, 2016

*LARISA POLICE OFFICIAL/ STATE PROSECUTOR ORDERED INVESTIGATION INTO WRONG MONASTERY IN SUMMER, FOCUSSED ON MY MONEY TRANSFERS TO WRONG MONASTERY, ST GEORGE, KARDITSA

*SAME STATE PROSECUTOR FASOULA HAS THE CASE AGAIN NOW

*DELIBERATELY IGNORED THE MANY TRANSFERS TO THEODEKTI POLYCHRONIA VALLIANATOU, ABESS OF ST JOHN THE FORERUNNER, PROOF WAS IN THEIR POSSESSION IN APRIL ALREADY

*THEODEKTI VALLIANATOU NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE PRIVATE BANK ACCOUNT ACCORDING TO CHURCH LAW

*MONASTERY WEBSITE SHOWS THEY CHANGED THEIR ACCOUNT TO A COMMUNITY ONE SINCE I PUT INFORMATION ON MY BLOG A FEW WEEKS AGO SHOWING THEODEKTI VALLIANATOU WAS CONTINUING TO SOLICIT DONATIONS TO THE MONASTERY TO HER PRIVATE ACCOUNT WITHOUT INFORMING PEOPLE IT WAS HER ACCOUNT, AN INDIRECT ADMISSION OF GUILT

 

An unsigned note in my file which appears to be either from the Larisa state prosecutor Christina Fasoula or the police in Larisa shows that justice officials in Greece from the very beginning were trying to suppress evidence in my case. See post below.

The proof that Theodekti Vallianatou is guilty of all the things I have accused her of is so overwhelming that the state prosecutors and police obviously did not dare even begin to investigate it.

Determined to suppress the evidence from the very beginning, they were forced to chose another strategy and that was to focus the investigation on the entirely wrong monastery.

The unsigned note asks for  my money transfers to be investigated but relates this to the wrong monastery, namely St George, Mavrommati, Karditsa.

At issue, are  the transfers of money I made to the private account of Theodekti Polychronia Vallianatou, Abbess of St John the Forerunner, starting in December 2014 shortly after I arrived and continuing for many months. According to church law, Theodekti Vallianatou is not allowed to have a private bank account.

Below are the bank details of my transfers to her account, which were given to the police, in part, in April and in detail in my report for the police in summer. They are also listed in the proof accompanying my latest report.

Beweismittel 1

How could the police have failed with so many bank transfers to the account of Theodekti Polychronia Vallianatou to have noticed she is the Abbess of St John, the Forerunner, and not St George, Mavrommati?

 

Bk1

BK2

 

An email from me to Theodekti Vallianatou and Theoktisti Emsley confirming one of the above transfers from me for 22,000 euros on 5th December 2014.

 

grass machine email.png

 

Transfers of money by me to the Skete of the monastery in Estonia are here.

Bk 3

bk 4.png


SCANDAL! GREEK JUSTICE OFFICIALS CAUGHT RED HANDED TRYING TO THROW MY CASE, NAMED WRONG MONASTERY FOR INVESTIGATION IN SUMMER

January 30, 2016

*LARISA JUSTICE OFFICIALS ORDERED AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE WRONG MONASTERY IN JULY  DELIBERATELY TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

*SAME STATE PROSECUTOR FASOULA NOW HAS MY CASE AGAIN AFTER SO CALLED POLICE INVESTIGATION INTO THE WRONG MONASTERY

*NOTE WITH WRONG MONASTERY APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN WRITTEN BY POLICE OFFICIAL OR STATE PROSECUTOR CHRISTINA? FASOULA

*APPEARS TO CONTAIN INSTRUCTIONS TO (BUT COULD ALSO BE FROM) POLICE OFFICIAL VANGELIS TOUTANAS TO FOCUS INVESTIGATION ON WRONG MONASTERY, RIGHT MONASTERY NOT NAMED AT ALL

*ASKS FOR INVESTIGATION INTO MY MONEY TRANSFERS, BUT TO THE WRONG MONASTERY

*NO REQUEST FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO MY MONEY TRANSFERS TO THE PRIVATE ACCOUNT OF THEODEKTI POLYCHRONIA VALLIANATOU, INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE SIDELINED

*CAN BE RULED OUT IT WAS A MISTAKE, A DELIBERATE ATTEMPT TO DIRECT THE INVESTIGATION DOWN A BLIND ALLEY

*POLICE, STATE PROSECUTOR AND LAWYER NOW ALL CAUGHT WORKING TOGETHER TO THWART JUSTICE

*LARISA DEPUTY STATE PROSECUTOR ANNA BALOGIANNI AND PROSECUTOR FASOULA AT THE CENTRE OF THE  SCANDAL, SHOULD RESIGN FROM MY CASE IMMEDIATELY

*POLICE OFFICIAL TOLD ME TO REMOVE PROOF LAWYER KONSTANTINOS CHRISTOPOULOS WITHOLDING EVIDENCE TO THROW MY CASE FROM MY BLOG ON ORDER OF BALOGIANNI

*WILL BRING CHARGES AGAINST BALOGIANNI AND POLICE OFFICIAL RESPONSIBLE

*HIGH LEVEL AND CONCERTED POLICE COVER UP IS MORE EVIDENCE THAT POWERFUL FIGURES WERE BEHIND THE ATTEMPT TO SILENCE ME IN THE MONASTERY OF ST JOHN THE FORERUNNER, ANATOLI

So this is justice under the government of Alexis Tsipras, who likely picked up his wrong spelling of Wernr Faynmann from my blog!

A note handwritten on a scrap of paper  in my lawyer’s file apparently giving instructions to investigate the wrong monastery to police official Vangelis Toutounas, whose name and number at  the Larisa police department are written at the bottom, strongly suggests the notion that justice officials in Greece have tried to thwart a proper investigation of the attempt to murder me on account of my journalism activities from the very beginning.

 

toutounas

The note is not signed but has the dates July 27th to July 31st, which was around the time I was told by my former lawyer Konstantinos Christopoulos that the police had ordered a “full” investigation.

I found this note in the file that my former lawyer handed over to me on Wednesday. The chaotic file contains no evidence whatsoever that any police investigation has taken place other than this scrap of paper giving instructions but with the name of the wrong monastery. The name of the right monastery is not mentioned anywhere in the confusing note.

The note asks for an investigation into money transfers made by me but links these to the wrong monastery. The transfers I made to the private bank account of Theodekti Polychronia Vallianatou are vital for the case. The fact she has a private bank account against church rules is already strong proof of criminality.

There are none of the instructions in the note one might expect in a police investigation. That is to say there are no instructions, for example, to question specific witnesses at St John the Forerunner or collect other specific evidence.

The name Vangelis Toutounas is written at the bottom together with the number of the public security office of the Larisa police department. But it is not clear if he wrote the note or is the recipient. It could also have been written by state prosecutor Christina Fasoula.

I did not ask for any investigation into events in St George, Mavrommati, Karditsa, the monastery I stayed at before I went to St John the Forerunner, Anatoli, in November 2014. I asked for an investigation into the murder attempt by Theodekti Vallianatou in St John the Forerunner, Anatoli, where I stayed for 18 months.

It can, therefore, be ruled out that putting the name of the wrong monastery was a mistake. Naming the wrong monastery and omitting the name of the right monastery is  a  deliberate attempt by justice officials in Larisa to send the investigation in the wrong direction.

The note also misleadingly links the money transfers I made to the private account of Theodekti Polychrinia Vallianatou to the wrong monastery. By omitting the name of Theodekti Polychronia Vallianatou, the wrong impression  is given that the investigation should focus on my money transfers to that wrong monastery, diverting attention from my transfers to Theodekti Vallianatou.

Clearly, if the police investigate the wrong monastery, they will not find any evidence of crimes in the right monastery, namely, St John the Forerunner, Anatoli.

The monastery in Karditsa is about 50 kilometres from Larisa and 100 from St John the Forerunner. So, there is no geographical proximity either.

Now, it has to be asked if the police questioned the nuns at St George or at St John the Forerunner or if any questioning, in fact, took place as I was told since the police at Larisa are also in on the cover up. They certainly knew the name of the right monastery because I filed charges against it at the Larisa police department in April.

But there is no sign of that police investigation in the file other than this scrap of paper directing the investigation to the wrong monastery.

The fact that the instructions to focus on another monastery is written on a scrap of paper  and not signed is another sign that justice officials are aware that he or she  was committing a criminal act. He or she did not want the false instructions to be on official paper or a part of any official file.

So, the lawyer, the police and the state prosecutors in Larisa have been colluding to thwart my case at least since July since it must have been clear to all them that St George is the wrong monastery.

I have been given the misleading impression by Konstantinos Christopoulos that a proper investigation was occurring when the intention was to focus on the wrong monastery as the note shows.

I am going to bring charges against Vangelis Toutounas and the  state prosecutors Anna Balogianni and Christian? Fasoula for their role in thwarting a proper investigation. They are the ones who are supposed to supervise investigation and make sure the police focus on the right monastery.

State prosecutor Fasoula has been reassigned my case. At least, she has the same suname as the other Fasoula.

Balogianni is also guilty of misusing her office to intimidate me when I revealed evidence of the cover up on my blog on Wednesday.

I received a call at 3 20 pm in the afternoon from the Larisa police and was told to come immediately to the police station even though I was told I had not committed any crime. When I refused, to go immediately to the police station, I was told a police car would be sent to my home with papers. When I was not impressed, I was told point blank to take the post offering proof of Christopoulos corruption down. I refused that too pointing out that it was a fact based blog post.

Readers of this blog will know this Micky Mouse investigation has dragged on for almost ten months already while Christopoulos was able to get the state prosecutor to have the police ring and intimidate me within a few hours.

The panicked reaction of the police can be explained by the fact they are all in on the same cover up. Because I have a blog and am a foreigner, it not so easy for them to arrest me in the police station and lock me up.

And if they want to claim I defaming them when I am offering proof, then I will slap more charges on them for making false accusations.

The Greek justice officials should recall that the Austrian justice ministry also tried that tactic and failed. The justice ministry had to withdraw the defamation charges against me because of the evidence I was being persecuted by justice officials and the public outcry.

I feel sorry for Greek journalists. I feel sorry for the Greek people, ruled by a  corrupt elite with the complicity of corrupt justice officials.

I am not going to be their victim. I will insist that every single police officer and state prosecutor and lawyer caught suppressing evidence is removed immediately from my case and put under investigation. 

 

christop 22

 

 

 

 


POLICE SUMMON ME IN ATTEMPT AT BULLYING

January 29, 2016

I have just received a call from the police in Larisa summoning me to the police station immediately even though I don’t speak Greek ( 0030 241 062 3158). The police woman refused, at first, to explain to me why I should go to the station or how I was supposed to communicate as someone who does not speak Greek.  She said a police car would be sent to my address to hand me papers. She confirmed I was not charged with any crime.

Lawyer Konstantinos Christopoulos deliberately tried to withhold evidence from my file. I presented some evidence on my blog yesterday and am in the process of translating the rest into Greek to the state prosecutor and police as soon as possible. Now it appears that he has filed a complaint with the state prosecutor and they acted immediately to harass me without examining the evidence.

Police told me to take down the blog post with evidence that Christopoulos is corrupt, saying he had filed a complaint that he felt insulted. I pointed out to him I am entitled to put evidence and proof on my blog and will not remove it.

Unacceptable attempt to bully a journalist performing a public watchdog function.