BIASED BBC ADMITS IT WILL DECLARE “FINAL RESULT” OF US ELECTION ON BASIS OF PROJECTIONS OF ABC, WHOSE JOURNALITS MET SECRETLY WITH THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN IN CLEAR CONFLICT OF INTEREST, SAYS BALLOTS WILL TAKE DAYS TO COUNT


The BBC has admitted it will rely on projections by its US-based partner broadcaster ABC, because it can take days for all the ballots to be counted to declare what the BBC calls final result of the US election at 23:00 EST (04:00 GMT), fuelling fears a rigged media will help Hillary Clinton steal the election.

Multiple mainstream media, including MSM, have been caught preparing graphics showing Hillary winning.

http://www.infowars.com/msn-caught-preparing-graphics-showing-hillary-victory/

In April 2015, a minimum of 38 top national reporters were invited to attend an off the record dinner with Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta in a clear conflict of interest. Those attending included ABC’s Diane Sawyer, CNN’s Gloria Borger, MSNBC’s Alex Wagner, Politico’s Glenn Thrush and VOX’s Jon Allen.

At least, 63 mainstream media reporters met or coordinated with Hillary Clinton campaign advisers in 2015 according to leaked emails.

http://economiccollapsenews.com/2016/10/24/wikileaks-63-msm-reporters-met-or-coordinated-with-hillary-clinton-campaign-advisers-in-2015/

Meanwhile, the BBC has itself come under attack from MPs for its clear bias against Brexit.

“Listeners to BBC Radio 4 are two and a half times more likely to hear the opinions of a pro-EU speaker than from anti-EU guests despite Britain’s recent vote to leave the EU, research has found. MPs on both sides of the house written to BBC bosses in protest, saying the figure points to clear bias within the Corporation.
Recent research by think tank News Watch, which analysed a group of 31 Radio 4 programmes and Features re-released by the channel in an i-Player series entitled “The Brexit Collection” found clear indications of bias within the eleven and a half hours of programming.

News Watch’s report noted: “There were no attempts in any programme to explore the benefits of leaving the EU, but conversely, Brexit came under sustained negative attack.

“This was reflected in the balance of contributions and comment contained within the items. Analysis by News-watch shows that only 23 percent of contributors in the programmes as a whole spoke in favour of Brexit, against 58 percent in favour of Remain and 19 percent who gave a neutral or factual commentary.”

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/10/15/mps-lodge-protest-bbc-new-research-confirms-anti-brexit-bias/

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: