FALSE FLAG ALERT! FAKE ISIS TO TARGET GLOBALIST SITES TO CARRY OUT REIGN OF TERROR

April 23, 2018

ZACH: INTEL INSIDER, DEEP STATE DEATH THROW! – ALEX JONES INFOWARS

Incredible! Plans seem to be in the work to stage false flags, possibly with chemical weapons, by ISIS against Globalist entities CNN, the UN and the Federal Reserve etc to allow for the Globalists to portray themsleves as victims and link the Globalists’ enemies to ISIS.

Globalists will use pictures of Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia wielding swords and grasping glowing globe to link Trump supporters and Infowars with ISIS.

Jeff Sessions is compromised by his former links to the KKK, rumours swirl. That’s the reason why Sessions is standing down in relation to the Clintons and Huma Abedin and allowing Rod Rosenstein and Mueller to persecute Trump.

Resign, Jeff Sessions! Do the honourable thing! Apologize and resign!

US military industrial complex opposes peace on the Korean peninsula. Plans for false flag to be blamed on North Korea to derail peace talks.

North Korea is being linked by Globalist misinformation to chemical weapons in Syria.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/948508/north-korea-syria-chemical-weapons-trade-syria-war-douma-chemical-attack

Fact is Infowars and Trump supporters are the most anti ISIS people on the planet.


Take the Syria missile strike quiz for UK citizens questioning the official narrative, my “war effort” to help repair damage caused by my email to W.H.O.

April 23, 2018

To help the UK government deal with a massive wave of doubt reported among  “educated and informed” people about the official narrative of the Syrian missile strike, I have decided to try, humbly, to help them out.

Yes, heartbreaking indeed, Emma, to think there are still critical thinkers! I know!

By the way, this re education effort is going to be in an  easy to answer, quiz format.

We’re going start off with a simple, warm up questions to test your general powers of logic.

1.  2 plus 2 equals?

A. 4
B. 5

The correct answer is B

If you said A, your logical processes are not acceptable to the UK government, go to advanced reeducation boot camp in detention centre London square.

If you said B, “I am your doormat, trample with your jackboots all over me,” collect a point towards your conscription in an EU army or workforce.

2. Read the two propositions and determine which one of the following four statements about these propositions is true?

Proposition 1
The UK government is
always great
always good
always honest
always right on Syria
never lies
pro you

Proposition 2
The Russian government is
ungreat
ungood
unhonest
always wrong on Syria
always lies
anti you

Statement

A. Proposation A or B is true
B. Neither A nor B are true
C. Both A and B are partly true
D. Proposition A and B are true

The correct answer is D

If you said D, collect two points towards your conscription in an EU army or workforce.

If you said A or B, go to reeducation detention centre Lubjanka square.

If you said  C, go straight to Lubyanka prison and forget about coming back out.

Oh, so you don’t want to collect points to get conscripted into an EU army? Well, it’s a damn sight better than a spell in a detention centre, okay? At least, you will have some chance of surviving on the eastern, North Korean, Syrian front (at least for a few months) and you will get a tobacco, alcohohl and food ration. But just for saying you don’t want to be conscripted, you go straight to Lubjanka. There’ll you’ll learn to appreciate the great, good, honest UK gov, okay?

On to our quiz..

 

3. What is the single, correct word to DESCRIBE a person who does not repeat propositions A and B when called on to

A. reasonable
B. a Russian disinformation agent

The correct answer is B

If you said A, go to reeducation detention centre Lubjanka square.

If you said B, collect five points towards your conscription in an EU army or workforce.

 

4. Is there any other word correct to DESCRIBE a person who does not repeat propositions A and B when called on to do so?

A. Yes.
B. No

The correct answer is B

If you said A, go to advanced reeducation boot camp in detention centre London square.

If you said B, collect ten points towards your conscription in an EU army or workforce.

5. What is the correct way of describing a Russian disinformation agent with a British passport, education and family?

A. My mate or pal or chum or family relative etc
B. A Russian bot

The correct answer is B. A British Russian disinformation agent is subhuman, a machine, android, a bot.

6. Is there any time the UK government is ever wrong?

Hint. Check propositions question 2

A. Yes.
B. No

The correct answer is B.

If you said A, go to reeducation detention centre London square.

If you said B, collect ten points towards your conscription in an EU army or workforce.

7. How should you address Theresa May?

A. Dear Prime Minister
B. Heil Fuhrer

The correct answer is B.

If you said A, go to reeducation detention centre London square.

If you said B, collect twenty points towards your conscription in an EU army or workforce.

Now we come to the practical part of your Syria education programme.

8. The words you can use to talk about the UK government are only ten in total, namely, great, good, honest, always true, heil Fuhrer, World War Three.

A Correct
B False

The correct answer is A.

Below is a video of a Russian agent who was engaged in cyberwarfare in an office in London following the Syrian missile attacks in a mobile Russian troll farm.

Pandatroll

9. If the UK government were to tell you this is a Russian panda destroying  key computers and spreading disinfo, would you say

A. You must be smoking something?
B. Heil Fuhrer

If you passed the test, you will allowed to maintain your UK citizenship on a provisional basis. You are getting the idea about why working out the truth about Syria is so “hard”.

It’s not about facts. It’s a about  a politically correct public narrative put out by the UK government which must be repeated without question using a vocabulary of four positive nouns and finishing with a gesture of abject submission (Heil).

Your partial UK citizenship means you can apply for the job as a journalist in the BBC, or for the job of Emma Beale. Poor thing, she needs a break.

If you did not pass the test, you will forfeit your UK citizenship. You are not getting the idea about why working out the truth about Syria is so “hard”.


Germany’s Largest Public TV News Broadcaster: Syria Chemical Attack “Most Likely Staged”

April 23, 2018

From Infowars

Germany’s Largest Public TV News Broadcaster: Syria Chemical Attack “Most Likely Staged”

It appears that all local Syrians encountered by the German public broadcast reporter were immediately dismissive of the widespread allegation

Zero Hedge –  April 22, 2018 74 Comments
 

Germany’s Largest Public TV News Broadcaster: Syria Chemical Attack “Most Likely Staged”

 

A senior correspondent for German state media broadcast ZDF heute stunned his European audience during a report from on the ground in Syria when he gave a straightforward and honest account of his findings while investigating what happened in Douma. The veteran reporter, Uli Gack, interviewed multiple eyewitnesses of the April 7 alleged chemical attack and concluded of the testimonials, “the Douma chemical attack is most likely staged, a great many people here seem very convinced.”

It appears that all local Syrians encountered by the German public broadcast reporter were immediately dismissive of the widespread allegation that the Syrian government gassed civilians, which the US, UK, France, and Israel used a pretext for launching missile strikes on Damascus.

ZDF heute: The world continues to puzzle over whether the banned chemical weapons were used in Douma. ZDF correspondent Uli Gack is in Syria for us: “you were in a large refugee camp today and talked to a lot of people – what did you hear about the attack there?” Gack responded, “the Douma chemical attack is most likely staged, a great many people here seem very convinced.”

 

 

The German ZDF report is consistent with veteran British journalist Robert Fisk’s investigation upon being the first Western journalist to gain access to the site in Douma. Fisk reported early this week, “There are the many people I talked to amid the ruins of the town who said they had ‘never believed in’ gas stories–which were usually put about, they claimed, by the armed Islamist groups.”

 

ZDF (Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen) is one of Germany’s largest and oldest state-owned channels, which is funded in part through citizens paying a household licensing fee, and Heute is perhaps the most visible public news program in all of Germany.

According to the live report, some witnesses told ZDF that Islamist rebels killed victims with chlorine, filmed the scenes, then claimed an ‘Assad chemical attack’. Though interviewing “a great many people [who] seem convinced” that a chemical attack did not actually happen, the reporter did not attempt to censor what he consistently heard from locals who were said to be in the area when the events occurred.

Increasingly, it appears that mainstream media gate-keepers are losing it over the fact that so many highly visible and respected reporters and broadcasters have featured reports this week which publicly question the Syrian chemical attack narrative and US coalition missile strikes that followed.

One writer for the Guardian and Daily Beast who is a well-known pro regime-change advocate, for example, laments that “disinformation has taken hold” on Syria. In a series of tweets following Robert Fisk’s bombshell report for the Independent, Emma Beals, who often simply parrots whatever her ‘rebel’ sources tell her reacted to the recent profusion of high profile pundits questioning the established narrative on major British platforms.

Beals wrote:


My educated and informed friends are emailing me en masse asking me about what’s going on in Syria because “it’s so hard to work out the truth.” Having spent years busting a gut to dig it out, it’s heartbreaking to see the extent to which disinformation has taken hold.

 

Beals advocates what we recently described as the highly simplistic “Disney version” of events in Syria:


Syrian War for Dummies: Disney Version–

Once upon a time, a country called Syria was ruled by a ruthless dictator named Bashar Al-Assad. He was a cruel man who gassed his own people. His actions caused a civil war in Syria. America and Europe tried their best to stop the devastating civil war, and even generously accepted many Syrian refugees. Eventually America went to Syria, defeated ISIS, and is now trying to restore stability.

This above version is quite popular among many Americans and Europeans and the Western mainstream media.

Meanwhile, almost simultaneous to German TV’s ZDF heute report from Syria, lawyers of the Bundestag (German federal parliament) issued a legal brief on the US-led strike on Syria. The government lawyers’ report was requested by the left-wing party Die Linke in response to the US coalition missile strikes which primarily targeted facilities in and around Damascus.

“The deployment of military force against a state to punish it for breaking an international convention is a violation of the international law prohibiting violence,” reads the report, as cited by the German Press agency DPA and translated by Sputnik.

The legal report further concluded that the US-led attack on Syria – which skirted the UN – but which was supported by the German government (though without German military participation) was based in chemical attack claims that the legal team deemed “not convincing”.

 

https://www.infowars.com/germanys-largest-public-tv-news-broadcaster-syria-chemical-attack-most-likely-staged/


In the spirit of communing without impugning…

April 22, 2018

In the spirit of communing without impugning, I offer the following:

CONSTRUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS
Wordy but worthy, conversations are defined by context and driven by purpose. The context of a conversation is its background, which involves the past and present. The purpose of a conversation is its goal, which involves the present and future. Combining the past, present, and future with pining, whining, and divining, conversations intertwine time with design, and mine with thine.

Hugh Mann


Does Trump’s latest, uncharacteristic tweet offer clue that North Korea could be blamed for next chemical attack false flag?

April 22, 2018

Is Donald Trump prepping for the next false flag now that his Syrian false flag chemical attack failed to ignite WW3, martial law, gun confiscation and mass internment in the USA?

All of a sudden, out of the blue, and after an apparent objective success in denuclearization negotiations with North Korea, the otherwise so ebullient and boastful Trump suddenly claims things may not work out, after all…

Frankly, after he morphed into Obama and nearly started WW3 last week only to be stopped, it seems, by the generals, I don’t trust Trump. Handsome is as handsome does. How Trump who ran as the anti Obama, anti interventionist ended up trying to do exactly the same thing as Obama, and try and start WW3 in the same way requires an explanation.

Now, the Syrian false flag has failed, Trump and the eugenicists Globalists have to find a new narrative, a new enemy to blame. Trump’s tweet could be either a welcome but new caution designed to warn Kim he wants real results. Or it could be a psy op, preparing the US public for the breakdown of negotiations and chemical and biological false flags to be blamed on North Korea.

I am not saying that is what is behind Trump’s tweet. But I do think we have to scrutinize Trump very closely after his Syria missile escapade. It’s in the interests of the USA and North Korea for the denuclearization talks to go well and for North Korea to go down a new path of peaceful, economic development.

We don’t want to see Trump breaking off negotiations on some tiny ground and threatening to launch a missile strike or ground war against North Korea on twitter, do we?

We need to be watching how he handles the negotiations. The potential for a disastrous WW3 conflagration is there.

From The Guardian

“We are a long way from conclusion on North Korea, maybe things will work out, and maybe they won’t – only time will tell … But the work I am doing now should have been done a long time ago!” Trump said on Twitter.

Trump tweeted those cautious words immediately after boosting the North Korean move, while taking a shot at the host of NBC’s Meet the Press, a regular target to whom he has applied characteristic derogatory nicknames.

The president wrote: “Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd of Fake News NBC just stated that we have given up so much in our negotiations with North Korea, and they have given up nothing. Wow, we haven’t given up anything & they have agreed to denuclearization (so great for World), site closure, & no more testing!”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/apr/22/trump-north-korea-nuclear-crisis


Not that funny after all…Have we just escaped the mother of all false flags predicted by Mike Adams? And was Trump a driving force for the end of the USA in the run up to his false flag missile strike by paving the way for gun confiscation and mass internment in FEMA camps by his attacks on the 1st and 2nd amendment joined by Melania?

April 22, 2018

sticky

After Melania was snapped smiling with Barack Obama at the funeral of Barbara Bush, I just double checked to see if  W.H.O. Spokesman Tarik Jasarevic is still alive.

http://hollywoodlife.com/2018/04/21/melania-trump-smiles-barack-obama-michelle-obama-barbara-bush-funeral-fan-reactions/

Yes, Melania, vocal supporter of gun control and depopulation eugenicist David Hogg, is totally at ease with Obama, the man who tried to wipe out the US with an Ebola false flag in 2014, prompting the US military to recruit Trump, who offered to take back the Republic…

The internet is speculating what Melania and Barack might have said to each other.

“Hillary was delighted with the Syria missile strike, Mel?”

“It was hard to pull off with his base being so vocal…”

“You couldn’t shut down Infowars and that birdflu666 blog…”

“Fareed said Trump had morphed into Obama. That didn’t go down well with the generals.”

Or

“That WHO spokesperson threw a spanner in the works at the last minute, Barack. We nearly got it through.”

Who knows what they said to each other? Eugenicist Globalist Obama is such a charming man after all. And charming too is Melania with her Slovenian accent as she goes on about students like David Hogg demanding gun control should have their voices heard. Shame, she doesn’t think someone like me, a journalist threatened for telling the truth, deserves to have my voice heard.

Tarik Jasarevic is still alive, by the way, so far. According to TASS, he was alive  anywayon April 17th when he responded to a request for info about Douma.

http://tass.com/world/1000331

It’s not funny. The other W.H.O. spokesman Glenn Thomas I was in contact with in 2014 was killed in the Ukraine, which was ruled at the time by my proven reader George Soros and by his fixer US ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, according to DNC leaks. He was killed just two weeks after he tried to stop an Ebola emergency declaration, which triggered a global vaccine campaign and martial law.

On June 27th 2014, brave, honest and good Glenn Thomas gave a platform to WHO Ebola expert Pierre Formenty who defused the Ebola hype in a press briefing in Geneva  as reported on this blog. By the 17th July, he was dead in a mysterious crash which the Dutch MP Peter Omtzigt says was brought down by Soros, Pyatt controlled Kiev, and the Ebola declaration was made.

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia-Airlines-Flug_17

http://www.voltairenet.org/article190874.html

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10979931/Malaysia-Airlines-only-confirm-death-of-Glenn-Thomas-four-days-later.html

The UK government, the BBC etc seem to be fuming at the way their claims about the Syrian chemical attack have fallen apart. They’ve moved from propaganda to brazenly bullying anyone who raises a doubt by branding them as Russian agents on air, including Admiral Alan West.

So, I guess my email exchange with Tarik Jarasevic confirming W.H.O had no evidence of a chemical attack just before Theresa May, Emmanual Macron and Donald Trump ordered a missile strike won’t go down well…

I just advise them that it’ll be pretty obvious, okay, if Tarik is hit by a plane while crossing the street in Geneva. Furthermore, he did not seem so much to want to help me as to avoid looking like WHO was hiding something.

As for my situation, fixer Geoffrey Pyatt is still the US ambassador in Athens even though he seems to be the one behind fixing my evidence George Soros was behind a murder attempt against me in such a way as to set me up for another de facto executioner.

Pyatt also seems to be behind the various false flag incidents with Turkey, the plot to engineer civil war through a football cup final and Macedonia name change and destabilize the entire Balkans. As long as he is ambassador, we can be 100% sure there is a major problem with Trump’s MAGA and a major ongoing threat to the USA and the world on the same scale as Hillary and Obama.

If Trump does not fire Pyatt and get me out of this situation by pressuring, at the very least, Alexis Tsipras, other proven reader of my blog, to settle out of court soon, then there will be good reason to believe he is compromised. After all, it seems he and his new NSA John Bolton were only stopped by the US military from ordering a missile strike on Russian and Iranian targets at the last moment, according to media reports.

Mike Pompeo’s CIA clearly failed to provide accurate information. Hillary recently praised Pompeo saying she was hopeful because he only brought two people with him i.e. he left her deep state NWO structures in tact to carry out just such false flags. So, more than one year into Trump’s presidency we have yet to see any firm evidence that Pompeo is against the NWO through his actions.

During his Senate confirmation hearing, Pompeo actually seemed to suggest that he envisioned regime change in Syria and American and Russian troops engaged in a direct confrontation…

In fact, it emerged in March that Trump actually offered the job of CIA head this year to Goldman Sachs banker Gary Cohn. The idea was dropped, probably because it would have been too obvious to his base what the deal was.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/03/gary-cohn-cia

My case is a litmus test if Trump really did run for presidency to MAGA or to keep Chris Christie out. Chris Christie said he would definitely have won if Trump had not run.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/367825-christie-absolutely-believes-hed-be-president-if-trump-hadnt-run

It may sound improbable but the US military intelligence agencies knew that Hillary spelled a continuation of a plan to destroy the USA by WW3 and Fema camps to establish a NWO begun by Obama, and they were determined not to have her elected.

And now we have just witnessed Trump for ourselves trying to start WW3 over a false flag. This after pushing together with Melania (remember her speech about how the voices of Parkland students deserve to be heard i.e. David Hogg, depopulation eugenicist?) and Don Jr ‘s a gun control agenda and confiscation without due process. Trump was only stopped by the rifle association.

Trump, Melania and Don Jr also turned a blind eye to an unprecedented crackdown of independent media like Infowars on the Internet. True, Trump did some good things with tariffs etc in the last few days. But  that could have been a psy op to lull his base before he unleashed the “mother of all false flags”, the Syrian chemical attack.

Does anyone really believe that Trump who is always railing against fake news was so moved by footage on that very fake news that he was ready to start WW3 out of pity for the victims? Didn’t he try the same trick last year at the same time with the same selective outrage directed at Syria?

Did HR McMaster have to go because Trump knew he would have resisted this time around? Is that why John Bolton, who was instrumental in using fake intelligence about WMD to start a war in Iraq was appointed to replace McMaster? And didn’t Bolton , in fact, repeat exactly the same behaviour as he did under George Bush and call for a massive missile strike when the whole world knew it was a false flag?

The stage was set with 3,600 US soldiers carrying out drills in Jordan for a rapid escalation of a ground war into a WW3, dragging in Europe, Russia, China as well chemical false flags in the USA (remember Nikki Haley warning about those out of the blue?), gun confiscation and the herding of Americans into FEMA camps if Trump had been able to carry out the missile strike as he originally planned it.

In fact, it was media under pressure like Infowars which called out Trump most forcefully on his Syria missile strike as well as my blog.

I don’t think any one buys the lie that Trump does not know what is going on in the internet crackdown or in my case either.  The  NWO tactic of the stand down and selective inaction is too well known in the meantime. Trump and Melania stood down the defence of the first amendment when it came to the independent media that got them elected to carry out the MAGA agenda. But when it came to David Hogg and the gun confiscation agenda, they were very vocal in support.

Trump and Melania have also been conspicuous in not inviting  Maryland hero Blaine Gaskill to the White House or promoting him. Where are Trump’s tweets praising the quick thinking Sheriff? Or Melania’s speech at some governor’s lunch saying the voices of gun control advocates should be heard? It’s all very one sided.

Does anyone really buy the lie they wanted to reach out across the political aisle? Do you give up the first and second amendment which your base voted you in to office to defend in an empty political gesture of reaching out to the Dems?

Every week he does not act, is a week where suspicion must increase, he is a fake candidate entered by a NWO faction fighting Hillary to get a better deal for them or he has been compromised.

The Soros lawyer and executioner in my case is even a NATO affiliated lawyer. So, that’s the lead all the way up to the Globalist elements in the Pentagon. They have the upper hand. As long as they have the upper hand, there is an immediate threat of more false flags.

More about Soros and Pyatt in the Ukraine from Zerohedge

Now more documents, in the massive 2,500 leaked tranche, show the immense power and control Soros had over Ukraine immediately following the illegal Maidan government overthrow.

Soros and his NGO executives held detailed and extensive meetings with just about every actor involved in the Maidan coup: from US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt, to Ukraine’s Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Justice, Health, and Education.

The only person missing was Victoria Nuland, though we are sure those meeting minutes are waiting to see the light of day.

Plans to subvert and undermine Russian influence and cultural ties to Ukraine are a central focus of every conversation. US hard power, and EU soft power, is central towards bringing Ukraine into the neo-liberal model that Soros champions, while bringing Russia to its economic knees.

Soros’ NGO,  International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) plays a key role in the formation of the “New Ukraine”…the term Soros frequently uses when referring to his Ukraine project.

In a document titled, “Breakfast with US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt”, George Soros, (aka GS), discusses Ukraine’s future with:

 

Geoffrey Pyatt (US Ambassador to Ukraine); David Meale (Economic Counsellor to the Ambassador); Lenny Benardo (OSF); Yevhen Bystrytsky (Executive Director, IRF); Oleksandr Sushko (Board Chair, IRF); Ivan Krastev (Chariman, Centre for Liberal Studies); Sabine Freizer (OSF); Deff Barton (Director, USAID, Ukraine)

The meeting took place on March 31, 2014, just a few months after the Maidan coup, and weeks before a full out civil war erupted, after Ukraine forces attacked the Donbass.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-20/leaked-memo-proves-soros-ruled-ukraine-2014-minutes-%E2%80%9Cbreakfast-us-ambassador-pyatt%E2%80%9D


A red hot tip for Theresa and the BBC about the real origin of Russian bots…

April 22, 2018

syria nocon

Oops, I meant to post up an email about a Russian bot, and I put up that email again from the W.H.O. from Friday 13th categorically stating there was no confirmation of a chemical attack in Douma.

Sorry about that again, Theresa, Boris!

Yes, I know that  BBC journalist Annita McVeigh let the cat out of the bag a little bit when she said that your missile strike at a time when WHO had no evidence confirming a chemical attack had massive implications in her interview with Admiral Alan West. Of course, I get you could end up in jail for trying to drag the UK into WW3 using a false flag!!! Didn’t I mention the Chilcott inquiry in my email to you before you ordered the strike? Look, I’m really sorry, okay! Yes, I get we are in an information war with Russia, okay? That’s why I want to give you, and the UK government, and the BBC a very hot tip.

https://www.infowars.com/uk-gov-guardian-newspaper-says-syrian-girl-a-russian-bot/

Listen up. I just got this tip from a source, let’s just say from my journalist sources in Moscow, okay? A red hot insider tip…

Pandatroll

You want to know who was really behind the 4000% increase in Russian bots? Well, it wasn’t Syrian Girl or Maram Susli or Ian @Ian56789. It was that Panda yet again.

Proof comes in the form of this video clip of Panda tweeting on his mobile phone as he moves from one black op site to the next.

I know you can’t see Panda’s mobile phone. That’s because his car is so crowded. See that shifty looking Ruskie sitting in front tweeting away? It’s also moving on a bumpy road on the border between Russia and Europe. Of course, they were reliable sources that informed me that that is Panda’s mobile troll farm. It can generate bots watched by audiences of more than 130 million people during an average road trip…

Why ask me? It’s obvious, Theresa. You know what to do! A missile strike on Panda! It might spark WW3 but you can’t lose the information war!

From Infowars

 

The UK government is attempting to silence dissent from those questioning the massive holes in the Skripal poisoning case by claiming all their opposition is “Russian bots.”

One of those “bots” identified by Whitehall is none other than “Syrian Girl,” real name Maram Susli.

Susli responded to the accusations with mockery:

Here’s how the state stenographers at The Guardian reported the news (which they’ve refused to correct for two days):

Russia used trolls and bots to unleash disinformation on to social media in the wake of the Salisbury poisoning, according to fresh Whitehall analysis. Government sources said experts had uncovered an increase of up to 4,000% in the spread of propaganda from Russia-based accounts since the attack,– many of which were identifiable as automated bots.

Theresa May highlighted the cyber-threat from Russia in her Mansion House speech earlier this year, telling the Kremlin: “I have a very simple message for Russia. We know what you are doing. And you will not succeed.”

But civil servants identified a sharp increase in the flow of fake news after the Salisbury poisoning, which continued in the runup to the airstrikes on Syria.

One bot, @Ian56789, was sending 100 posts a day during a 12-day period from 7 April, and reached 23 million users, before the account was suspended. It focused on claims that the chemical weapons attack on Douma had been falsified, using the hashtag #falseflag. Another, @Partisangirl, reached 61 million users with 2,300 posts over the same 12-day period.

…May said afterwards: “Russia is using cyber as part of a wider effort to undermine the international system. This disinformation campaign is not just aimed at social media and the UK – it is intended to undermine the actual institutions and processes of the rules-based system, such as the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons. We must do all we can at every turn to challenge this.”

The state not being allowed to lie people into war with total impunity is undermining our “international system.”

The other “bot,” Ian56789, also went on Sky News to refute the government’s claims (his account was evidently later unsuspended).

 

Ian56  @Ian56789
 
My interview today on @Skynews refuting the UK gov’s malicious, completely fabricated & false allegation that I am “a Russian” bot.
I got a few Zingers in on Live TV, please watch.https://youtu.be/nuWoLTV9StU?t=2m51s

My written statement refuting UK gov allegations http://ian56.blogspot.com/2018/04/sky-statement-why-im-not-russian-bot.html

 

https://www.infowars.com/uk-gov-guardian-newspaper-says-syrian-girl-a-russian-bot/