Why should Europe, Russia and the globe risk nuclear war for the profit of the banks?
(NaturalNews) An Italian court has unearthed a formerly classified document that proves vaccines cause death, and that vaccine companies don’t want you to know this. As published on the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) website, a 1,271-page report by British drug firm GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) reveals that certain combination vaccines administered to children are known to cause sudden death, but the company chose to obscure and conceal this in official safety reports.
Table 36 in the GlaxoSmithKline Biological Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance report to Regulatory Authority shows that nearly all of the 67 reported deaths following Infanrix Hexa administration occurred within the first 10 days. Only two of these reported deaths occurred after 10 days, and yet GSK reported them all together as transpiring sporadically across the entire 20-day period, insinuating that they were merely coincidental.
“[I]f one analyses the data looking at deaths in [the] first 10 days after administration of vaccine and compares it to the deaths in the next 10 days, it is clear that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in the infants below 1 year, occur in the first 10 days and 3% (2 deaths) occur in the next 10 days,” explains Child Health Safety. “Similarly in children older than 1 year, 87.5% [of] deaths (7 deaths) occurred in the first 10 days and 12.5% (1 death) occurred in the next 10 days.”
90% of deaths occurred within five days of vaccination
An even closer look at the data tables, which GSK deliberately withheld from public view, reveals an even more shocking fact — the vast majority of sudden deaths actually occurred within five days of Infanrix Hexa administration, which further implicates the vaccine. A shocking 90% of the deaths, 60 of them, occurred within five days of the shot being given. And 75% of the deaths occurred within three days of the shot.
This is all quite revealing — the stuff of lawsuits, no doubt, with which GSK is more than familiar. As you may recall, GSK is the same drug company that was fined $3 billion for promoting antidepressant drugs for off-label uses. The case has since been dubbed the largest health fraud settlement in U.S. history, which says a whole lot about the integrity of this company.
Should GSK ever be found guilty of deliberately withholding critical safety data that, while it probably would have cut into the company’s bottom line to make it public, may have saved children from early death, it could potentially make history again as earning the title of the most shamefully greedy and profiteering corporation in the world (next to Monsanto, of course).
U.S. Media Blackout: Italian Courts Rule Vaccines Cause Autism
by MARY S. HOLLAND | AGE OF AUTISM | FEBRUARY 10, 2015
On September 23, 2014, an Italian court in Milan award compensation to a boy for vaccine-induced autism.
A childhood vaccine against six childhood diseases caused the boy’s permanent autism and brain damage. While the Italian press has devoted considerable attention to this decision and its public health implications, the U.S. press has been silent.
Like the U.S., Italy has a national vaccine injury compensation program to give some financial support to those people who are injured by compulsory and recommended vaccinations. The Italian infant plaintiff received three doses of GlaxoSmithKline’s Infanrix Hexa, a hexavalent vaccine administered in the first year of life. These doses occurred from March to October 2006.
Measles Transmitted By The Vaccinated, Gov. Researchers Confirm
Posted on: Tuesday, January 27th 2015 at 9:15 am
Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder
A remarkable study reveals that a vaccinated individual not only can become infected with measles, but can spread it to others who are also vaccinated against it – doubly disproving two doses of MMR vaccine is “99% effective,” as widely claimed.
But the problems surrounding the failing MMR vaccine go much deeper. First, they carry profound health risks (over 25 of which we have indexed here: MMR vaccine dangers), including increased autism risk, which a senior CDC scientist confessed his agency covered up. Second, not only does the MMR vaccine fail to consistently confer immunity, but those who have been “immunized” with two doses of MMR vaccine can still transmit the infection to others — a phenomena no one is reporting on in the rush to blame the non- or minimally-vaccinated for the outbreak.
MMR Vaccinated Can Still Spread Measles
Last year, a groundbreaking study published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, whose authorship includes scientists working for the Bureau of Immunization, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, looked at evidence from the 2011 New York measles outbreak that individuals with prior evidence of measles vaccination and vaccine immunity were both capable of being infected with measles and infecting others with it (secondary transmission).
This finding even aroused the attention of mainstream news reporting, such as this Sciencemag.org article from April 2014 titled “Measles Outbreak Traced to Fully Vaccinated Patient for First Time.”
As this blog has pointed out, the GSK vaccine is a combination of a cold virus and an Ebola virus. A Merck vaccine with a combination of a similar cold virus and an AIDS virus was found to give people AIDS.
At the very least, NIH is admitting that the experimental vaccine will not protect people against Ebola.
Also, the trial is classified as a phase 2 and 3 trial, suggesting that no clearly separate phase 2 clinical trial is taking place as Dr Stephen Kennedy, the leader of the trial, has suggested.
The US clinical trials data base states that enrollment will continue after initial tests on 600 people in the absence of major safety issues, but there is no definition of what constitutes a major safety issue.
Also, the NIH document states the vaccine was developed by US bioweapons scientists:
“Nancy J. Sullivan, Ph.D., chief of the Biodefense Research Section in NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center (VRC), working in collaboration with a team of VRC researchers and scientists at the Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases and Okairos, a Swiss-Italian biotechnology company acquired by GSK in 2013, developed the vaccine.”
It has to be asked whether this and other information addressing the risks of the experimental vaccine have really been communicated to participants in the GSK Ebola vaccine trial as part of the informed consent process, or if there has been a real informed consent process at all. Media reports from Liberia indicate people do not feel they have been given information.
One of the key people backing the Ebola trial, Dr Fatoma Baloy, is the director of the Liberian Institute for Biomedical Research (LIBR), where US army bioweapons researchers were working on Ebola before the current outbreak.
In addition, the NIH document on the PREVAIL Ebola trials underway in Liberia refuses to state that the results from the phase 1 trials showed that vaccine was safe. Instead, reference is made only to the results which were published.
Presumably these results, which have been called misleading by Hans Tolzin.
No answer is given to how the safety of the study participants will be ensured.
“10. How will the safety of the PREVAIL study participants be ensuredWhen will the PREVAIL trial be completed?
“This is all quite revealing — the stuff of lawsuits, no doubt, with which GSK is more than familiar. As you may recall, GSK is the same drug company that was fined $3 billion for promoting antidepressant drugs for off-label uses. The case has since been dubbed the largest health fraud settlement in U.S. history, which says a whole lot about the integrity of this company.
Should GSK ever be found guilty of deliberately withholding critical safety data that, while it probably would have cut into the company’s bottom line to make it public, may have saved children from early death, it could potentially make history again as earning the title of the most shamefully greedy and profiteering corporation in the world (next to Monsanto, of course).”
Journalists, lawyers or government officials who make use of their right to free speech and express legitimate concerns about the Ebola vaccine trials currently underway in Liberia have been threatened with arrest by the Deputy Minister for Information, Isaac Jackson.
Jackson made the threat at a press conference when it emerged that 42 adverse reactions have been recored among the first 108 people to take the Ebola vaccine.
Jackson made the completely unproven claim that the vaccine trial would help Liberia to fight Ebola.
Liberians must charge and arrest Isaac Jackson for incitement to commit criminal acts and for threatening the constitutional rights of Liberians to freedom of speech, freedom of the press, informed consent in vaccine trials and their right to self defence. To damage someone with an experimental Ebola vaccine is a crime. Forty two people have already been damaged by the Ebola vaccine.
The poverty of Liberians is being exploited by GlaxoSmithKline and WHO and 40 dollars is being offered to induce people to participant in one of the most dangerous experimental vaccine trials ever in modern history.
Liberians are being offered a tiny sum to risk their health and even life in a vaccine trial, which aims to enroll 30,000 people.
Not even the Nazis enrolled that many prisoners in their malaria and jaundice vaccine experiments.
No Ebola vaccine has ever passed clinical phase 1. That means, no Ebola vaccine has ever been shown safe enough to proceed to phase 2. Deaths and damage from the ongoing experimental Ebola vaccine trials in Liberia are, therefore, to be expected.
Unfortunately, it seems that GlaxoSmithKline, WHO and the Liberian government know that deaths and damage are likely to occur . That is why they appear to have been been so keen to bypass the traditional clinical trial structure to conduct a vast experiment on thousands of Liberians.
Their cynical calculation appears to be that the people who take the vaccine and their relatives will be too poor to gain redress and they can bribe enough key Liberian officials.
According to media reports, Liberians who take the vaccine are not being informed of the substantial risks associated with the experiment in breach of rules on informed consent.
Given this incredible abuse, it is very welcome indeed that the Liberian parliament has decided to investigate these trials, which are being conducted without consulting the representatives of the people of Liberia.
During a hearing at the Liberian parliament last week, it emerged that there are no plans to compensate people whose health is damaged or destroyed by the experimental vaccines. GSK and WHO expect the impoverished Liberian people to pay compensation for any victims of their experiments. What happens if thousands are sick? How will the Liberian tax payers find the money to compensate them?
Understanding the risks, only 108 people participated in the vaccine trial last week, and it is to be hoped that this criminal experiment is stopped immediately before the public lose trust in their government.
Whatever scientific knowledge may be gained from this wild experiment — and it is not clear that anything of value will be gained — can in no way justify the real risks to the health of 30,000 people, which is posed by the Ebola vaccine.
Dr Stephen Kennedy, the leader of the vaccine trial, should have his medical license withdrawn because the trial is in breach of every accepted medical standard. The flimsy legal basis for the vaccine trial rests on an evidently fraudulent Ebola emergency declaration. And if investigations and inquiries in future determine the declaration to have been fraudulently made, Dr Kennedy as well as GSK and WHO management could, and should, be held to account for conducting dangerous experiments on the Liberian people for spurious scientific reasons.